Friday 10 April 2020

Epidem-ideology: how political dogma affected the response to Covid-19

According to an opinion poll published on 15 March by NBC/Wall Street Journal

I just looked up the data: worldwide, the number of deaths caused by Covid-19 is fast approaching 100,000.  It will probably run past that heart-breaking milestone, by the time I finish writing this.

Italy is (still) the country most affected: with a population of 60 million, it registered more than 18,000 Coronavirus deaths – that’s 300 per million inhabitants.  Italians have already spent weeks in lockdown.  The Italian economy – not very healthy to start with – is in intensive care and may never completely recover.

South Korea has a somewhat smaller population: 51 million.  But its death toll currently stands at just 208 – 4 deaths per million inhabitants.

Why this huge difference – no less than two orders of magnitude in mortality rates?  I could tell you that there are many reasons, that they are complex, that we are studying them carefully…  But I’m not a politician and – even more so under the current circumstances – am disinclined to muddy the waters.

We find a hint about the reasons for the Italian-Korean disparity in a recent interview with Italy’s Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte.  Asked whether his government’s response had not been ‘too little, too late’, Mr. Conte doubled down:
"We have a completely different system to China. For us to severely limit constitutional freedoms was a critical decision that we had to consider very carefully.  If I had suggested a lockdown or limits on constitutional rights at the start, when there were the first clusters, people would have taken me for a madman."
Mr. Conte is probably right: some people, perhaps many people, would have taken him for a power-grabbing madman, had he imposed “limits on constitutional rights” too early in the process.  But then, isn’t this what a leader is expected to do – make unpopular, but timely and efficacious decisions in an emergency?  Spot the iceberg ahead before it becomes obvious to the naked eye – and veer hard to avoid it, even if it rocks the boat and nauseates the passengers?  Otherwise, Mr. Conte, nobody needs you: let’s have governance by opinion poll!

The cruel, brutal, heart-wrenching irony is that Giuseppe Conte has not protected constitutional rights: his government ended up imposing a tougher, longer and more painful lockdown than the South Koreans ever experienced.  In the process, he trampled the most important constitutional right of all: the right to live.

In South Korea, legislation allows the government – in times of emergency only – to access essential information, such as the telemeter data from mobile phones, the location of credit card transactions, etc.  Some may see it as a ‘Big Brother’ invasion of privacy.  But that information is collected anyway – in the databanks of telecom companies and financial firms.  And access to it is crucial to containing the pandemics, by locating and isolating early people who came in contact with already identified virus carriers.  In Israel, there is even an app for that: one can register on that app and check for him/herself whether they have been in the immediate proximity of a known virus carrier.

Of course, this does not provide full-proof (or even fool-proof) protection; it does not kill the infection – but it prevents it from killing too many people.  Would you suspend for a while – just for a while – your oh-so-dear right to perfect privacy, if you knew it may save one life?  Or 10?  Or thousands?  I know I would!

Of course, I know the dangers: ‘it’s a slippery slope…’, ‘once there’s a precedent…’, ‘ give them one finger…’, etc. etc.  But hey: as Mr. Conte said, we do not live in China.  We are lucky enough to live in countries with a tradition of democracy, with governments that are elected and accountable.  The risks are there, yes, but so are the solutions; we can deal with those risks after we save those old and vulnerable (or just unlucky) among us.  Denying ourselves the means to save people’s lives in an emergency, just because those means may be misused later?  That’s like not calling armed officers during a terrorist attack – to pre-empt the risk of future police brutality against peaceful protesters.

But it’s not just about accessing data – there is more misplaced ideological ballast that should have been thrown overboard, once that iceberg first appeared onto the radar screens.

Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte and
President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen.
No, they do not congratulate each other for their response to Covid-19. 
For a certain tinge of politicians, political activists and just loud-mouthed scatter-brains, ‘freedom of movement’ has morphed from a desideratum to be considered and adopted where beneficial – into the be-all and end-all of ‘progressiveness’ and political correctness.  To the point where they now see it as an immovable principle – circumstances be damned.

As early as 24 January 2020, France had identified three cases of Covid-19 on its territory – all three imported from China.  A month later, Italy had announced its third Covid-19 death.  Yet on 29 February, as the infection was expanding like fire in a pile of dead wood, the pompously named – but poorly led – World Health Organisation was issuing the following ‘wise’ recommendation:
“WHO continues to advise against the application of travel or trade restrictions to countries experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks.”
Needless to say, the European Union bureaucrats were only too happy to comply with – and reinforce – that mind-boggling advice.  As late as 2 March 2020, as no less than 66 countries were reporting Covid-19 cases, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control was serenely assessing:
“The risk of acquiring the disease for people from the EU/EEA and the UK travelling/resident in areas with no cases, or multiple imported cases, or limited local transmission, is currently considered low to moderate.”
In blissful accordance with the EU ‘multilateral’ and legalistic approach, ECDC also advised that
“Travel and trade restrictions during a public health event of international concern (PHEIC) are regulated under the International Health Regulations (IHR), part III.”
Well, this is what ‘the experts’ said, but what about the politicians?  The ones elected to keep us all safe?  The captains charged with steering us away from death and misery?

On 22 January 2020, the annual World Economic Forum was taking place, as usual, in the beautiful, tranquil ski resort of Davos.  Defying that tranquility, some experts chose that posh gathering of international figures to ring the alarm bells about a strange pandemic that was already devastating Wuhan.  A former US disease control czar named Dr. Richard Hatchett was among the first to spot the approaching iceberg:
“China was unfortunate in that that’s where the epidemic started, but it is now a global problem.”
Few of the politicians paid attention.  The newly-elected (appointed?) European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen did not even mention the pandemics in her hour-long speech.  The address was, instead, laden with all the formulaic niceties politicians use when they have nothing particularly interesting to say.

Of course, European politicians are not stupid enough to rely on EU Commission’s clairvoyance at the best of times – let alone when flying excrement hits the proverbial fan.  Give it a bit of strain (let alone a global pandemic) and the ‘Union’ dis-unites into national governments driven by the good ol’ ‘each man for himself’ attitude.

So on 31 January, the Italian government banned flights to and from China.  Of course, to describe this as ‘closing the stable door after the horse has bolted’ would be charitable.  In fact, while people could no longer fly directly from Beijing to Milan, they could still fly there via Berlin, Paris or Vienna; they could even drive or train it across the beautiful Alps – and the Schengen Area’s non-borders.  No, this was definitely a case of closing the door of a stable that had no walls.  If you, dear reader, think that this is particularly stupid… well… I can’t really blame you.  But then, you must remember that the Italian prime minister’s main concern was not keeping his people healthy – but keeping them from doubting his own mental health.  He needed to accomplish that difficult task – while also being seen as ‘doing something’.

On 25 February, a gaggle of European health ministers met in… Rome.  Where they sagely decided that imposing a travel ban within the EU would be “disproportionate and ineffective”.

It’s not that the EU Commission was oblivious; no, they were widely awake to the danger posed by Covid-19… to Africa’s weak healthcare facilities.  On 13 February, they attended a presentation by World Health Organisation officials, who warned that the entire African continent had only two laboratories able to test for Coronavirus.  Consequently, on 24 February, EU commissioners announced a donation of 114 million to WHO and €15 million earmarked for African lab facilities.  An ample Commission delegation flew to Addis Ababa on 26 February, for a series of meetings with African Union officials.  (The only thing that the European Union and the African Union have in common is the word ‘Union’; but hey: it’s such a powerful word!)

At the time (and still today) Africa was the least affected continent.  No, not because of the abundance of testing labs and ventilators – far from it; just because… most Africans don’t travel that much, and not that many people travel to Africa.

Why, then, you may ask – the focus on Africa?  Well, it’s just another instance of ideological – rather than logical – decision-making: a large part of the European political class is constantly on the look for ‘weak and oppressed’ to save; even when they don’t particularly need saving.  That admirable attitude comes with quite a pinch of racism: Africans are seen as the eternal victims, the world’s quintessential ‘weak and oppressed’.  It’s the new ‘white man’s burden’; but also a well-tried way for a ‘privileged white person’ to feel good about him/herself.

And it’s not just career politicians – the same frame of mind has infected the layer of professional political activists who like to – rather pompously – refer to themselves as ‘civil society’ or ‘human rights organisations’.  By the beginning of April, the number of Covid-19 deaths in the UK was edging towards 3,000; the country had already spent a week under lockdown.  An even tougher (and earlier) lockdown had been declared in Israel, where there were already dozens of deaths.

Yet two ‘pro-Israel’ outfits decided to convene a (virtual, because of the lockdown) ‘emergency briefing’ on… the dire Coronavirus situation in the Gaza Strip (which, ironically thanks to the Israeli-Egyptian blockade, had 9 already isolated cases and – fortunately – no deaths).  I read their advert twice, to make sure this was no April Fools joke.



It wasn’t – it was dead serious.  Yachad UK and New Israel Fund UK had entrusted the ‘emergency briefing’ to a couple of ‘civil society’ representatives from Israel and Gaza, chaired by Donald Mcintyre – a journalist/political activist with The Independent with a history of very harsh anti-Israel ‘criticism’.  Mr. Mcintyre had also in the past blamed the failures of British foreign policy (revoltingly pro-Israel in his opinion) on “Jewish party donors”.  But hey: why should valiant builders of the ‘New Israel’ disqualify someone for chairing their briefing, merely because he is suspect of harbouring antisemitic prejudice?

Anyway, I was interested to learn from that most absorbing briefing that, according to international law, Israel is responsible for everything that happens (or might happen, or could conceivably happen) in Gaza.  I must admit that my knowledge of international law cannot compete with the expertise of those civil society luminaries.  Still, I was wondering how exactly was Israel supposed to discharge that clear responsibility – given that any Israeli who ventures onto the Strip is imprisoned – if not immediately killed?

By the way, I tend to focus on the failures of European leaders and ‘civil society’ simply because I happen to live in what is – only arguably by now – Europe.

Not that the US administration – which comes from a rather different ideological neck of the woods – did much better.  Trump started by dismissing the whole thing as leftist exaggeration – if not outright fake news designed to hurt the great American economy and his own chances of re-election as President.  After all, no sensible virus would take on the might of the United States – now would it?  

But, by 12 March, with South-Western Europe claiming a rather inglorious leadership in Coronavirus pandemics, the US imposed a 30-day travel ban on the entire European Schengen Area.  With hindsight, this was a modest and very, very belated step in the right direction.  But one that immediately attracted the bitter ire of European freedom-of-movement ideologues.  Indeed, EU officials condemned the new Trumpian heresy in the strongest terms.  A prominent Belgian MEP (from the Green Party) called Trump’s decision “irresponsible”.  A physician by training, she delivered that sage verdict in a TV studio, while sitting face-to-face with her interviewer.  Then she turned her attention to more burning issues: the (harsh, in her opinion) EU asylum policy; and the bloc’s far-from-sufficient cuts in carbon emissions.

But only 5 days later (17 March) the EU chiefs were imposing a ban on travel into the Schengen Area.  By then, however, they were just desperately trying to board a train that was already moving away – as several Schengen countries had already re-instituted border checks…

On 23 March, Italy reported 602 Coronavirus deaths in just 24 hours; the total number had exceeded 6,000.  On the same day, EU foreign policy chief Josep Borell announced that the bloc would send 20 million in humanitarian aid to I… no, not I-taly, but I-ran!  Which had just announced 127 new deaths in 24 hours, bringing the official count to 1,812.

No doubt, the Italian prime minister (whose mental sanity must by now be well-established with his co-nationals) had that little Iran detail in mind when he bitterly declared, in a recent interview, that the “European project” might fail over its response to the pandemic.  But I’m positive Mr. Borell will reassure him that it’s nothing personal: helping Iran, rather than Italy, is just deep-seated EU ideological impulse.

As for myself, I'd like to reassure Mr. Giuseppe Conte that he is not alone: I, too, am most concerned about our “constitutional rights”.  I think we have the right to be led by people endowed with leadership qualities and a sense of civic responsibility.  We have the right to demand that those leaders (politicians, civil servants and ‘experts’) wean themselves from the intoxicating political dogma; that they check their ideological baggage in at the gate – before they start making decisions about our life and death.  Because, if they keep betraying their oaths of office; if they get it wrong by placing ideology before epidemiology – I say we have the right to demand a reckoning.

39 comments:

  1. Noru, you write that "An even tougher (and earlier) lockdown had been declared in Israel, where there were already thousands of deaths." Israel has, in fact, suffered a total of 95 deaths thus far - although there are 10,000 diagnosed cases.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Geoff, absolutely right -- well spotted. My mistake, I wanted to say "dozens of deaths". I've corrected it, thanks for letting me know.

      Delete
    2. It is a well-known fact that Illuminati consist of Multi Millionaires,
      Billionaires who have major influence regarding most global affairs,
      including the planning of a New World Order. Many world leaders,
      Presidents, Prime Ministers, royalty and senior executives of major Fortune
      500 companies are members of Illuminati. join a secret cabal of mysterious
      forces and become rich with boundless measures of wealth in your company or
      any given business, the great Illuminati can make everything possible just
      contact : join666cult@gmail.com or WhatsApp +1(646)481-0376 EL
      IAI LEXION Thaddeus Iam Vice-President of Citizen Outreach THE ILLUMINATI
      ORGANIZATION

      Do not hesitate to contact us by WhatsApp.

      Whatsapp: +1(646)481-0376
      Email : join666cult@gmail.com

      BEWARE OF SCAMMERS, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS REGISTRATION FEE AND YOU MUST
      BE ABOVE THE AGE OF 18YRS.
      THANKS

      Delete
  2. programming engineers are being conveyed to help in the battle against the COVID-19. best face masks

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow, excellent post. I'd like to draft like this too - taking time and real hard work to make a great article. This post has encouraged me to write some posts that I am going to write soon. abogado de inmigracion consulta gratis

    ReplyDelete
  4. Its a great pleasure reading your post.Its full of information I am looking for and I love to post a comment that "The content of your post is awesome" Great work. Windsor consultant dermatologist

    ReplyDelete
  5. Your blog provided us with valuable information to work with. Each & every tips of your post are awesome. Thanks a lot for sharing. Keep blogging.. 안전놀이터

    ReplyDelete
  6. Superbly written article, if only all bloggers offered the same content as you, the internet would be a far better place.. 대전1인샵

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yet, I actually require double a the very first moment of those conventions with solid proof for viability: zinc, quercetin, nutrients D and C. Covid Test Cambridge

    ReplyDelete
  8. RSJ is at the top of our game when it comes to tax-minimization strategies for asset growth, protection and transfer. We have always known that something was missing from traditional estate planning for high-net-worth families. my site

    ReplyDelete
  9. Superbly written article, if only all bloggers offered the same content as you, the internet would be a far better place.. 먹튀검증

    ReplyDelete
  10. 바카라사이트
    Hello I am so delighted I located your blog, This is my website and it has been very helpful. How did you come up with this brilliant idea? This is one of the sweetest stories and everyone enjoys it very much. I enjoy visiting many websites.
    You have done a great job. Please visit my website and give your opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I definitely enjoying every little bit of it. It is a great website and nice share. I want to thank you. Good job! You guys do a great blog, and have some great contents. Keep up the good work. fisa twristiaeth india

    ReplyDelete
  12. I just couldn't leave your website before telling you that I truly enjoyed the top quality info you present to your visitors? Will be back again frequently to check up on new posts. 먹튀검증

    ReplyDelete
  13. That's a great article! The neatly organized content is good to see. Can I quote a blog and write it on my blog? My blog has a variety of communities including these articles. Would you like to visit me later? keo nhacai


    ReplyDelete
  14. 온라인바카라27 November 2021 at 22:22

    I've been searching for hours on this topic and finally found your post. 온라인바카라, I have read your post and I am very impressed. We prefer your opinion and will visit this site frequently to refer to your opinion. When would you like to visit my site?


    ReplyDelete
  15. Nice article thank you for this. Check the Kenya visa requirements before you apply for the Kenya visa through online visa application. The e visa application offers the fast visa services. Thank you

    ReplyDelete

  16. Very nice articles . keep writing such a fanatics blogs. Very nice articles . keep writing such a fanatics blogs. India Exit Permit Processing Fee is usually dependent on the country and type of visa. Mainly there are two types of Exit Permit fees: Service Fee and FRRO Fee. know more please visit the website.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I like your work and this hit me directly... Thanks for sharing with us... please continue this... Hey! Do you know about that? The US ESTA visa is not the same as a USA evisa, it's a portal for citizens of the countries which are under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP). For more information on ESTA visas just click and know more about it.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hey guys, if you are planning a tourist trip in Myanmar, You will need a visa to enter Myanmar. You can apply for Myanmar tourist visa online. You can read all the information here about how to apply for a Myanmar tourist visa through our Myanmar Visa website.

    ReplyDelete
  19. The article you wrote has many valid points, despite the fact that I have read it many times. Your readers will benefit greatly from this content. Travelers can apply for an e visa Turkey which is very easy. You can apply online from any corner of the world. You only need an internet connection and valid documents.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Great Job! That is the same thing that I am trying to find. Thanks for sharing with us... Here is some info for the traveler The application for an electronic visa Turkey is easy to fill out for everyone, you can also apply for a Turkish Visit Visa, check out the page for more information.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Many thanks for this specific info and for sharing valuable tips. This is what I was looking for. 먹튀

    ReplyDelete
  22. Congo, officially known as the Republic of the Congo, is a Central African country that requires visitors to obtain a Congo visa before entering. And it requires a valid passport, filled application form and other supporting documents like travel arrangements and proof of residence. Visa fee varies depending on the length of stay and purpose of visit. Congo boasts a rich culture and diverse natural beauty, with opportunities for wildlife safaris, hiking and cultural immersion. Despite the visa application process, Congo is a rewarding destination for adventure travelers seeking a unique African experience.

    ReplyDelete
  23. In response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, Turkey has implemented essential measures to ensure the safety and well-being of its visitors. The COVID-19 Entry Protocol Turkey Form is a crucial step for travelers planning to visit this beautiful country. Before your journey, it's essential to familiarize yourself with the entry requirements and fill out the necessary form. This form will collect important health and contact information to facilitate efficient contact tracing and provide you with a safe and enjoyable travel experience. By adhering to the COVID-19 entry protocol and submitting the required form, you can embark on your Turkish adventure with confidence, knowing that you're contributing to a responsible and health-conscious travel environment.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Hello everyone, Navigating through international travel often involves more than just reaching your destination. If Turkey is a layover on your journey, understanding the essentials of the Turkey Transit Visa is crucial. Here's a comprehensive guide to help you through the process.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Hello! I wanted to express my gratitude for the valuable information shared on your blog. Your dedication to providing in-depth insights is truly commendable. Visit visa Saudi Arabia with a 30-day Visit Visa! Discover its rich culture, historical sites, and breathtaking landscapes. Plan your Arabian adventure today and experience the magic of Saudi Arabia.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hello everyone, The Indian Embassy in Manchester serves as a vital link between India and the United Kingdom. This diplomatic mission plays a pivotal role in fostering bilateral relations, assisting the Indian diaspora, and promoting cultural exchanges.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Your willingness to impart wisdom is a valuable contribution to our learning journey. Reasons for Indian e-Visa rejection and useful tips to avoid them, ensure passport validity of at least six months from your arrival date, and provide correct size passport photographs. Upload the required documents in the specified format, use a valid email address and understand the eligibility criteria. Authenticity in your application is important to prevent misrepresentation issues.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Your blog is a trove of knowledge and insight. The depth of your content and the precision with which you elucidate complex topics are truly extraordinary. Each post is an enriching odyssey, and I eagerly anticipate the next. Your dedication to enlightenment is evident in every word. Keep up the exceptional work!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Your blog is a delightful surprise. Your eloquent writing on left me feeling both enlightened and inspired. Your thoughtful insights and in-depth research make for a truly engaging read. I eagerly anticipate more of your content to expand my knowledge.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Hello, dear friend! Your blog is like a warm hug in the digital world. Your latest post was like a heartwarming conversation with a good friend, filled with valuable insights. Thanks for making learning feel so friendly and enjoyable!

    ReplyDelete
  31. Exceptional content results from the amalgamation of depth and accessibility. The fusion of expertise with reader engagement transforms intricate concepts into engaging, enriching knowledge for the audience.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Within the confines of your blog post, a literary kaleidoscope takes shape, effortlessly weaving vibrant ideas into a harmonious tapestry. Each sentence serves as a brushstroke, crafting a vivid canvas of intellect and creativity. The eloquence with which you express complex thoughts is truly captivating. It's a symphony of insight, leaving readers enriched and inspired.

    ReplyDelete
  33. This blog embarks on an ethereal odyssey through uncharted realms of intellectual brilliance. The author's prose, a radiant guide, unveils profound landscapes of thought. Each paragraph unfolds like a harmonious chapter in a symphony of enlightenment, transcending conventional reading. It's an immersive journey, leaving an indelible mark on the reader's intellectual exploration, a celestial sojourn into cognitive excellence.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Your article expertly delves into the intricacies of the subject matter, offering a unique viewpoint that had me engaged from start to finish. The smooth blending of information and your distinct voice makes it stand out. I admire how effortlessly you simplify complex ideas into easily digestible content. Looking forward to more stimulating posts from you – this was a delightful intellectual journey.

    ReplyDelete
  35. "What an incredible read! Your ability to simplify complex topics is truly remarkable. I found myself engaged from start to finish, eagerly absorbing each nugget of wisdom you shared. It's clear that you're passionate about helping others grow. The actionable advice you've provided is invaluable—I can't wait to put it into practice. Your writing style is friendly and approachable, making learning a pleasure. Looking forward to more insightful content from you.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Developing blog posts is a constant in my routine, and I truly value the quality of your content. This captivating piece has caught my attention. I've made sure to save your site in my bookmarks and keep myself informed with fresh insights, usually on a weekly basis. Furthermore, I've subscribed to your RSS feed. For Egypt visa application in Singapore, follow consulate guidelines. Submit required documents, including passport and application form. Ensure accuracy for smooth processing. Research thoroughly for updated information.


    ReplyDelete
  37. Hearing your praise for my content brings me great happiness! Your support motivates me to keep delivering high-quality work. I'm grateful for your commitment to staying informed and excited to share more enriching articles with you.

    ReplyDelete

 
;